Many children find it difficult to concentrate on or pay attention to their studies at school.
What are the causes?
What are the possible solutions to this problem?
It may not that phenomenal but quite noticeable that some kids feel it is hard to stay focused in their classes. Schools, teachers, and parents are making attempts to figure out the reasons behind that with the aim to perfect the educational system where each child could absorb knowledge, learn skills so as to be prepared for their future life. This essay is going to undertake exploration for the cause of this issue and try to make some suggestions for it.
The foremost reason for this issue is tightly related to the profession of teachers. Their methodology for teaching kids is not desirable. Undeniably, a certain proportion of teachers are not that professional. They cannot organize the classes reasonably. How to intrigue their students’ interests is not their strong suit. Relating their teaching contents to some practical issues is beyond their ability. However, children are naturally naive, curious, and mind-exploring. Those tedious classes surely cannot grab their attention. Children not dozing off in such dreary classes is a miracle. Secondly, the arrangement of classes should be blamed for such a phenomenon. As far as I am concerned, the subjects are so finite in supply for students, some of whom could not find the classes they are really into. Unfortunately, to meet their requirement for graduation, they have to choose some subjects out of the boring ones to learn. In order to pass exams and get credit, students might try to pay attention to their teachers, but this kind of attention is involuntary. It takes so much effort that it is just a matter of time for students’ minds to wander off.
Based on the causes for this problem, there are some suggestions to solve it accordingly. To start with, training teachers is the top priority. Not only should they be excellent in their academic field, but also master teaching methodology. How to apply what they have learned to each class is quite of great importance. With years of experience, they are qualified to present an absorbing class for kids. What‘s more, schools should open up more choices of subjects for students, which will lower the possibility that students feel hard to devise their new term class schedules.
- Some people think that government in developing countries should introduce new technologies to people in order to improve the quality of life while others believe that in order to achieve that government should offer free education for all Discuss both th 61
- Some people think that government in developing countries should introduce new technologies to people in order to improve the quality of life while others believe that in order to achieve that government should offer free education for all Discuss both th 67
- Many people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport Do you agree or disagree 73
- Even if science and technology would continue to advance and improve the quality of people lives the most significant improvements have already taken place Do you agree or disagree with the following statement 90
- Some people think that older school children should learn a wide range of subjects and develop knowledge Others however think that they should only learn a small number of subjects in detail Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ld could absorb knowledge, learn skills so as to be prepared for their future life. This...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1142, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'minds wandering'.
Suggestion: minds wandering
... is just a matter of time for students’ minds to wander off. Based on the causes for this pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, as to, kind of, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03814713896 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76402818487 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555858310627 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.871814034 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3913043478 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9565217391 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.39130434783 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170822719472 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474693851887 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437424575163 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115143422813 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313973826272 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.