The monthly price of exported rice from ThaiLand and VietNam from 2012 to 2015 (Million dollars per tons)
Given are the two line graphs contrasting the price of rice exported per month in two agriculture countries, namely Thailand and Vietnam during a four-year period, commencing from 2012.
It is conspicuous that rice from Thailand was worth more than its Vietnamese counterpart during the time frame. Furthermore, the rice price witnessed a wild swing in each month.
In January of 2012, rice was exported with a significant price in Thailand with over 500 million dollars per ton while it had a lower price in Vietnam with exactly 400 million dollars per ton. Despite their drastic plunges in the second quarter, these prices recovered and stabilized in the remainder of the year in Vietnam and reached a zenith price with 550 million dollars per ton in Thailand. In 2013, there was a dramatic decrease in price in both regions, from 550 million dollars and 360 million dollars per ton in the first month to 400 million and 350 million in the last month in Thailand and Vietnam, respectively.
In 2014, the rice price in Vietnam plateaued at around 330 million dollars per ton, while an steadily soaring price in 2015 with 330 million dollars was recorded in December. In Thailand, although the price of rice exported in 2014 was higher than 2015 in January, with 450 million dollars for the former year and 405 million dollars per ton for the latter, the reverse was true in December with a slight higher with 470 million dollars in 2014 compared to 460 millions dollars in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-23 | kevann | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-29 | nhinhi999 | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | ryannguyen0303 | 84 | view |
| 2020-07-15 | Hoang Minh | 77 | view |
- Government should make people responsible for looking after their own local environment Do you agree or disagree 61
- The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and present day 84
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The internet has changed the way we communicate Much communication today happens through social media Some people support this and think it is a positive development Others believe that social media have negative effects Discuss both these views and give 78
- In the modern world people no longer need to use food from animals or products from animals such as medicine and clothing To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two line graphs contrasting the pr...
^^^
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Given are the two line graphs contrasting the pric...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...witnessed a wild swing in each month. In January of 2012, rice was exported wi...
^^^
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ound 330 million dollars per ton, while an steadily soaring price in 2015 with 330...
^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...llion dollars was recorded in December. In Thailand, although the price of rice ex...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87007874016 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47053753404 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476377952756 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.9959237926 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.625 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.75 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.627465973841 0.215688989381 291% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.300738658921 0.103423049105 291% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099900839244 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.376931592829 0.15604864568 242% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117813186742 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.