We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Each person has unique personality and character that can shape the way of thinking, and some other external factors like knowledge and experiences also affect the method of thinking. Differences in ideology, visions, and opinions are an inevitable result of these factors forming our beliefs, so one must accept that we can not force people to align with our opinion easily. The notion that says learning from people with the same views will generate more than when we learn from people with differing views seems acceptable and true at first, yet in reality discrepancy of beliefs will create a room for opportunity to grow. For example, when we want to solve a grave problem that needs various points of view, each group with typical opinion or idea will add information to the effort of solving the problem. The more diverse the idea is, the more chance we have better outcome, and in the process we will learn many things from the contradictions and debates. There are some reasons that can explain this position.
The contradicting view can open the weakness of our position, and it can be a positive way to improve our position. The way we think will result in certain kind of opinion or analysis, and some of our opinions might have same typical characteristics that can not be changed unless we use different approach in thinking. When we talk about how we solve global warming, most people who care about environment will definitely ask for hard approach like leaving behind fossil fuels in energy generation as soon as possible. On the other hand, people who understand the system really well may argue that it would not be easy to transfer from fossil fuels to renewable in just a short amount of time. Numerous preparations, steps, and a stack of cash must be provided in order to fulfill the goal of avoiding the worsening global warming effects. This contradiction from the opposing view gives new insight to the proponent of renewable energy that we can not be too hasty in transforming our system to the renewable depended one. The efforts will take time, and it will be too costly if we take haphazard approaches. Many bad things will also can result in the end. For example, economic crisis can happen if we did not make the right calculation in investment and funding. This example proves that, at many times, opposing views will also become our opportunity to evaluate our views. The weakness of our view can be identified by the other people who think differently. Additionally, in return, all opposing sides will receivew new learnings, facts, and knowledge from the other sides that have different expertise; hence, the process of contradicting teaches people many things as much as from people with same belief or even more.
Differing in opinion might also teaches us a new way to see problems and how to solve them. The use of the same method of problem solving might be advantageous in term of the comfort of using common tools, yet it does not provide flexibility that is often needed in solving problems. Sometimes our method will not as effective as the others’, and it is wise to use better technique that is previously unknown to us.
However, actually we also can learn more from people with the same belief with us. Sometimes, people with more experiences tend to have more knowledge than us, and it is easier for us to accept and learn from people with the same view. For example, conventional teachers from the common education system might learn from one another especially the young one can follow his or her seniors in many things. They will, of course, not ask the teachers from homeschooling system. Nevertheless, differences in views will yield in more and better learning and result in the end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-28 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | kenbaker | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | Gnyana | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | prakhar432 | 76 | view |
| 2022-10-02 | Ruthvik_542 | 70 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from a budget planner for the city of Grandview When the Grandview Symphony was established ten years ago the city of Grandview agreed to provide the symphony with annual funding until the symphony became self sustaining T 58
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Alta Manufacturing During the past year Alta Manufacturing had thirty percent more on the job accidents than nearby Panoply Industries where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours Experts b 68
- We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take 66
- The following appeared in a business magazine As a result of numerous complaints of dizziness and nausea on the part of consumers of Promofoods tuna the company requested that eight million cans of its tuna be returned for testing Promofoods concluded tha 59
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 75
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, so, well, for example, kind of, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 34.0 12.4196629213 274% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3111.0 2235.4752809 139% => OK
No of words: 641.0 442.535393258 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85335413417 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.0316973083 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60139271236 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446177847114 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 966.6 704.065955056 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 12.0 1.77640449438 676% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9725356859 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.653846154 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6538461538 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304099650057 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982798356242 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726957202369 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198700369033 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111228934368 0.0667264976115 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, so, well, for example, kind of, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 34.0 12.4196629213 274% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3111.0 2235.4752809 139% => OK
No of words: 641.0 442.535393258 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85335413417 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.0316973083 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60139271236 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446177847114 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 966.6 704.065955056 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 12.0 1.77640449438 676% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9725356859 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.653846154 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6538461538 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304099650057 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982798356242 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726957202369 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198700369033 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111228934368 0.0667264976115 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.