In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe
that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries
above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In today’s world, an individual can earn an enormous amount of money, which is multiple time higher than the average wage. While some contend that the government should limit people’s income, others support this trend and argue that it attributes to the economic growth. Personally, I am partial to the latter.
There are solid reasons why the government should apply a limit for individual’s income. First and foremost, the income gap between boss and employees are immense, which discourages workers from thriving for a better life. They find the situation to be unfair and there are not much they can do about it. Therefore, along with the introduction of a maximum paid wage, there should also be a higher minimum wage, this would help to fill the income gap between the rich and the poor. As a result, lower income households could afford a higher living standard while top paid individuals could maintain their wealth.
However, I am with those who advocate that people can earn as much as their capable of. One obvious reason is that enterprises could recruit talented employees, who require a high paid salary. Those who put in the time and work should have the right to receive what they deserve, this would encourage workers to put more effort into their job and grinding to be better everyday. In addition, when people start earning more, the tax revenue increase and thus the government could spend this money on building more infrastructure, such as hospital, parks, schools. Therefore, the overall well-being is improved and poor people could afford a better living standard.
In sum, although the income gap between classes in the society is expanding, the benefits of the rising income per individual are weightier. Rather than setting a limit for earning, more emphasis should be placed on improving the minimum wage
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-04 | LEEANHTUAN | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-04 | jagrit sharma | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-18 | Gulnoza11 | 89 | view |
| 2020-10-18 | karamdeep03 | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-15 | _3nastya4_ | 73 | view |
- The world s natural resources are consumed at an ever increased rate What are the causes of this situation What are the solutions 73
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later Some people think that having these people to give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about the dangers of committing a crime Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some think that all entertainment TV programmes should educate people about the importance of social issues To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- All towns and cities need to have large outdoor public spaces such as parks or squares Do you agree or disagree 78
- Topic Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used to learn important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...nto their job and grinding to be better everyday. In addition, when people start earning...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04918032787 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55229844615 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577049180328 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9263766895 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120870393521 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425354470501 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442433509482 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0754585235281 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360523562403 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.