Companies should provide Sports and Social facilities for local communities
To what extent do you agree?
At present, some people think the company they work for should have sports and social facilities for them. From my point of view, I agree with this opinion.
First of all, Employees will feel comfortable and understand each other better when working. Today with the improvement of machines, human-to-human communication is more difficult than ever. This is a reason why sports or team-building events should be focused on. Based on the survey results, the percentage of employees who feel comfortable and want to work for the company is largely due to these activities. It not only helps employees feel comfortable at work but also helps them bond more closely to solve problems at work. As a result, now, most companies are using this method to retain employees as well as make them more able to communicate with their colleagues.
Secondly, with these activities, employees in the company can exchange and learn from each other to improve their skills as well as connect emotionally, especially for team members. “The way you play a game is a way you work” this quote is written in a very famous book, and we can see it in this situation. When employees play sports or community activities together, they will easily learn to coordinate and communicate with each other, so they can more easily work together in the workplace. Not only that, when they get to play together, they will be able to learn from each other as well as share a lot of things, especially difficulties at work, to solve together. The results are clear that when applying this to work in companies, employees will be able to work together more easily than companies that do not apply this method.
In conclusion, feeling comfortable, understand, and being taught each other are a reason why businesses should have other activities to bring employees together. It not only helps employees understand and coordinate with each other, but also helps the company increase production productivity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | linh allie | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | linh allie | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | HaleyLin2000 | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | HaleyLin2000 | 56 | view |
- Due to the development and rapid expansions of supermarkets in some countries many small local business are unable to compete some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities To what extent do you agree 73
- Due to the development and rapid expansions of supermarkets in some countries many small local business are unable to compete some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities To what extent do you agree 73
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands now being done by machines does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages 61
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands now being done by machines does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages 56
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands now being done by machines does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01829268293 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78715903792 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487804878049 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5499122067 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.733333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137437228193 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552793981064 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683889605302 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114197263122 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919745073201 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.