The chart below shows how much money is spent in the budget on different sectors by the UAE government in 2000.
The graph provides information about the amount of money is used by the UEA government to financialised several sectors in 2000.
At a glance, it is clear that a significant amount of money was allocated to social security sectors, and the least was spent on transportation.
To begin with, as many as AED 100 billion was allocated to fund the social and security sector, followed by health and personal social services, and education at AED 53 billion and 38 billion respectively. Next, the UEA government invested just around two-third of the amount spent on social and security funding into three different sectors which were debt interest (AED 23 billion), other expenditures (AED 23 billion), and defense (AED 22 billion).
Law and orders sectors received as much as AED 17 billion of government funding, and almost a similar number was allocated on housing, heritage, and environment (AED 15 billion). Lastly, the transportation sector received the least amount of government funding in 2000 with AED 9 billion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-30 | Hanabi | 87 | view |
| 2022-01-05 | mido2070 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | Sanaullah97 | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-16 | hannahbui | 84 | view |
- The chart illustrates average CO2 emissions per person in four European countries between 1975 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 67
- Some claim that men are naturally more competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 77
- Some commentators feel that grandparents should live together with their children and grandchildren while others say that elderly people should be encouraged to live independently Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate and reach your 56
- People are living in a throwaway society using things for a short time and then throwing them away What are the causes of this What problems does it lead to 84
- The pie chart shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, so, third, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17575757576 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94520512724 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557575757576 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.9496632048 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.333333333 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172820141911 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105088146234 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501588294117 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121439716063 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047080271617 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.