The graph shows the information about international conferences in 3 capital cities in 1980-2010. Summarize the information and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the line graph revealing 3 capital cities in terms of the information of international conferences from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, it is immediately apparent that there were downward trends in city A and city B, while city C witnessed an upward trend until the year 2000
As can be seen from the graph, in 1980, the number of international conferences in city A was the highest at 35 conferences, followed by 30 conferences in city B. During the period, both cities A and B recorded similar trends which are declined to 30 and 20 conferences, respectively in 1985 and both experienced a minor increase in 1990. This number continued to climb and reach a peak of 25 conferences in 1995.
Turning to the remaining groups, while the number of conferences in these two cities went through fluctuated whereas the figure for city C peaked at 35 in 2000. Furthermore, after 2005, the data of all three cities, namely city A, city B, and city C, followed a downward trend which declined to almost 30, 25 and just under 25 conferences, respectively
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-06 | Haphuong204 | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 Measured in tonnes 85
- the charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education levels of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 51
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of females aged 16 25 in particular country who participate in sports compares with the percentage of people who watch them in 2000 75
- The diagram below shows the multistage production of pears as canned fruits Write a report for a university lecturer describing the process below 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73224043716 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95362141833 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584699453552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.833142639 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.333333333 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244749921168 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140181520218 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139097290887 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190473017352 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139279407672 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.