The graph shows the information about international conferences in 3 capital cities in 1980-2010. Summarize the information and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the line graph revealing 3 capital cities in terms of the information of international conferences from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, it is immediately apparent that there were downward trends in city A and city B, while city C witnessed an upward trend until the year 2000
As can be seen from the graph, in 1980, the number of international conferences in city A was the highest at 35 conferences, followed by 30 conferences in city B. During the period, both cities A and B recorded similar trends which are declined to 30 and 20 conferences, respectively in 1985 and both experienced a minor increase in 1990. This number continued to climb and reach a peak of 25 conferences in 1995.
Turning to the remaining groups, while the number of conferences in these two cities went through fluctuated whereas the figure for city C peaked at 35 in 2000. Furthermore, after 2005, the data of all three cities, namely city A, city B, and city C, followed a downward trend which declined to almost 30, 25 and just under 25 conferences, respectively
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-06 | Haphuong204 | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of females aged 16 25 in particular country who participate in sports compares with the percentage of people who watch them in 2000 75
- The diagram below shows the multistage production of pears as canned fruits Write a report for a university lecturer describing the process below 75
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- the charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education levels of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73224043716 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95362141833 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584699453552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.833142639 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.333333333 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244749921168 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140181520218 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139097290887 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190473017352 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139279407672 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.