The table below shows the results of surveys in 2005, 2010 and 2015 about McGill University.
The table reveals the information about ratio of pupils grades on various aspects of McGill university with five years gap from 2005 to 2015.
Overall, Teaching quality and library was most popular in students. All the services which provided in university was improved their rating with the time instead of range of modules offered in university. Sports and social facilities was had same rating over the time period in McGill university.
The data shows that teaching quality was fluctuated in 15 years with 74 in 2005 and slightly increased over the time, reached 78. Library had overall increased 1 however it was 86 in 2005. Student service is only a thing which was significantly improved trough the time. In 2005 student service was had 54 rating, after 5 years in 2010 it reached 81 and in 2015, it was 95 which most high rating in university by student. Rang of modules offered by university had fallen their rating from 39 to 25 in 15 years. However, Sports and social facilities had stable rating 65 in 2005, 2010, and 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-15 | phuongchi17899 | 75 | view |
| 2021-10-18 | Muhammad Hassam Saeed | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-18 | Muhammad Hassam Saeed | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | vutrang23 | 11 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | vutrang23 | 26 | view |
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life What are those problems Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 67
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2005 2010 and 2015 about McGill University 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82122905028 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48465846097 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553072625698 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6044300692 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202547202416 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843156193248 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810690956138 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161043449179 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0937448865926 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.