With the development of social media, more and more youngsters are being allowed unsupervised access to the internet in order to meet and chat with friends which can lead to potentially dangerous situations.
In the 21st century, along with development of technology, people gradually depend on what’s happening on the internet. Many youngsters contact friends on the internet uncontrollably that puts the young on the verge of danger. The forthcoming essay will discuss the causes and recommend feasible solutions for this issue.
One of the first causes of this issue is the development of social media which bring variou emotion to people. Talented engineers have carried out innovation that is making more and more social media such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and others which allow everyone access and express ego. People can meet and chat with friends easily, as a result, they want to make more friends even who they don’t know before. Furthermore, lack of care for children of family is the one that has enabled the young to depend on the internet. Children who lack interest in real life will find people who care about them on virtual life instinctively. Hence, the development of social media and lack of attention of parent lead to dangerous situations to the youngsters.
The solution that need to be considered is avoiding meet and chat with strangers. When we controll social media activities, we can take advantages from social media without bad affections. Moreover, family who live with youngsters need to take care of them. Young-age is the age that have complex psychological chages, therefore, the family should spend time to sympathize them and promptly prevent if something was wrong.
In conclusion, although this obstacle has been vastly spreading among young public, yet they can get rid of it by avoiding make friend with strangers and family should take care of children more.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-18 | pththom02@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-19 | ZeeKhan | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-11 | tarakrindani | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | hamza.ijaz980@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | Ayesha dar | 81 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15107913669 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68344359363 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564748201439 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7536519884 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.285714286 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383614801624 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117059167602 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798902608213 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200147648496 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080487409577 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.