The use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries and shops. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people consider that people can not use mobile phones when they are in places, which require them to keep silent like libraries, shops. In my opinion, I partly agree with this rule and this essay will provide suitable reasons with explains and examples.
It is true that people should have good behaviors when they come to public places since this is not their private area, which they can do anything they want. Therefore, using mobile phones might disturb others, who need extremely concentrate on their works. For example, when someone has a call right in the libraries, they should go outside so they will not create noise to those are reading or searching documents. In addition, some people believe that if they are going to the libraries to find documents for study, they should not let the phone near their place since this decreases their works effectively. This is because mobile phones have lots of apps, which attract people use and spend numerous time playing and chatting instead of learning.
On the other hand, despite using mobile phones in public places seem to be bad, we can deny the fact that we still need to bring mobile phones into these places. The first reason is that in some cases when others need to meet or talk to you immediately, then using mobile phones is a great way to connect each other in the far distance. For example, when My mum wants to check the place where I am standing, she will use her mobile phone to call me, which helps her feel relieve since she knows that I am safe. The second reason is that having a mobile phone in your pocket can provide you a lot of information so you can understand what is going on outside. For example, when you go the library and you do not understand the price of books you need, you can use your phone and search it so you feel less confused.
In conclusion, I think we should not use mobile phones in the public area if we disturb others but use mobiles phones quiet and not a sound into still can acceptable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-02 | nguyenkhang | 70 | view |
| 2021-10-20 | buiminhduc | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | KEVA | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-07 | KEVA | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-07 | tamle | 78 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 78
- more and more people now own cars What are the problems associated with an increase in the usage of private cars How these problems can be solved 56
- the chart show that time spent on two devices according to various categories Describe the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 61
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 572, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ot let the phone near their place since this decreases their works effectively. This...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, still, then, therefore, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, in some cases, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 54.0 24.0651302605 224% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53739612188 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19549663917 2.80592935109 78% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498614958449 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 23.8694675117 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 126.0 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7692307692 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3846153846 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326193037001 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123221927243 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627599279131 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196732493024 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713042596159 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.