The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The figure for requests delivered to the Tourist Information Office in a singular city in the first half of 2011 is depicted in the line graph.
From a prospective view, this organisation recorded an upward trend in questions sent in person or by telephone while letter/email deliveries followed a contradictory movement. Moreover, the statistics of personal reception was the lowest then became the highest at the end of the period.
From a quick glance at the line graph, the number of enquiries received in person by the Tourist Information Office rocketed continuously throughout the first half of 2011 from slightly over 400 to approximately 1900 units. The same pattern was encountered in terms of telephone receipts; however, from January to March, the figure fell slightly to 400 questions then recovered significantly which was followed by a maintenance at 1000 units. After that, the data revealed a tremendous increase of exactly 600 requests.
Moving on to analyse the circumstances of enquiries recorded in emails or letters. Initially, the Tourist Information Office reported a minimal drop in terms of mail, then the figure dived to under 400 units in May. Finally, the statistics of enquiries sent by letters or emails leveled off at the mentioned number.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-26 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
- The bar chart below shows changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001 16 7 2020 84
- The bar chart shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 78
- Companies use a variety of methods to increase sales of their products What different methods are being used Which is the most effective 89
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25980392157 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01554268635 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553921568627 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9871779064 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.222222222 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190493761631 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774156321291 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845106997355 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124416080623 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696396142919 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.