As countries develop, more and more people buy and use their own cars, Do you think the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment?
In current days, the enormous number of private cars are dramatically purchased in developed and developing nations. Personally speaking, I believe that this development will negatively affect each nation’s environment.
On the one hand, it is true that owning personal cars is the best way to serve private purposes in lieu of always waiting for the public vehicle. First of all, if families own private cars, they can ensure perfectly there is no more education or work-related procrastination. Second, when we compare between public and personal vehicles in any journeys, visitors can not be proactive in any situations such as having a meal in well-known eateries, ceasing journeys to cap magnificent sceneries, etc. So in terms of individuals, people will definitely prefer owning a car to using public transports.
On the other hand, people have to acknowledge the negative effects of personal cars on our current living environment. Scientifically speaking, the leading pollutants in most developed nations nowadays are from industrial zones and personal vehicles which release billions of tons of fossil fuel on a daily basis, thus this will lead to many dangerous impacts to citizens, such as air pollution, domestic water pollution. Hence, due to negative impacts, the average ages of most developed national citizens are always substandard, even though they themselves can enjoy attractive lives in urban areas. Moreover, this development not only negatively affects humans, but also the current environment. It is true that the more fossil fuel from private cars, the more our environment is destroyed.
In conclusion, I believe that even though owning a car can bring comfortable and safe feelings, in contrast this development is the way to destroy both people’s health and environment. Hence, I perfectly agree that the development’s negative terms outweigh the positive terms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-08 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-03 | hellielts | 89 | view |
| 2022-06-23 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | minhquanvn | 78 | view |
- Some people think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to modern buildings To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 67
- Organized tours to remote areas and communities are increasingly popular It is a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 67
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tive terms outweigh the positive terms.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, thus, well, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49659863946 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05211797427 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.122754113 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.307692308 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206087045255 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779362387236 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437798390315 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125828740289 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136399886293 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.