Some people think that more money should be spent to promote the use of bicycles in cities. Others, however, believe that cities should focus on investing in public transport systems.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is noticeable that governments are now trying to drive the society to a sustainable development through vehicle habit orientation. While making bicycles prevalent would be a positive measure, I would argue that public transport should be prioritized in most countries.
On the one hand, bicycles are beneficial to the society as a whole for some reasons. From a personal perspective, cyclists are healthy since practicing burns calories and support to metabolic progress, thereby decrease possibility of disease. From a social point of view, cyclist help to create an eco-friendly environment through directly discard exhaust fume disposing to the air. Furthermore, traffic congestion is partly from private vehicles added whose volumes are beyond current infrastructure system. Thanks to traveling by bicycle, it would make the city less crowded in peak hours.
On the other hand, I would argue that it is better to promote public transport as a priority for several reasons. It is inevitable that this is the most effective way to tackle the ongoing issues in most countries. Taking buses and trains rather than driving personal cars and motorbikes result in curbing pollutant and easing traffic congestion. Take Japan as a good mirror in making effort to low traffic jams and pollution rates thanks to their transportation culture using Shinkansen. Apart from that, the bicycle is not as feasible as public transport for long distances. People can travel to work which is far away, 10 km for example, however, it would take an hour compared to approximately 20 minutes by bus. From the above points of view, public transport is a better measurement the government could take to address the current problems.
In conclusion, although I believe that cycling contributes great outcomes to the community, it would be better to invest in infrastructure for public transport system at first.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-24 | IELTS learner from VIETNAM | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-14 | Lily Vu | 91 | view |
- In developing countries children in rural communities have less access to education Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and Inte 73
- The plans below show the layout of a conference room in which training sessions with different numbers of people can be held Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Newspapers are less important nowadays because we have up to date access to the news on the internet To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, so, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29568106312 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.937959242 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607973421927 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1851527057 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.266666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175943503069 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542313469178 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509259906764 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108238194966 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267918014612 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.