The charts below show the percentage of the energy generate from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003. To summarize information by selecting key characteristics and compiling a report and, if necessary, make a comparison.
The pie graphs manifest the proportion of resources generating energy of a particular nation in 1985 and 2003. From an overall perspective, renewable, natural gas and coal experienced an upward trend. In contrast, oil and nuclear power witnessed a considerable decline. Throughout the period, oil was the pivotal energy resource, meanwhile the least utilized counterpart was renewable.
Concerning the former group, in 1985, there was only 1% of power originating from green sources like sun, water or the like. However, in 2003, that figure had increased to 4%. Likewise, the percentage of natural gas 13% and 23%, nearly a quarter, in each year. Coal, notwithstanding possessed a lower fraction, had the same pattern with 8% and 13%.
Oil used to make up more than half the energy generated in the middle of 1980s, nonetheless, after a few decades it plummeted to precisely 39%. Regarding the second largest sources, the proportion of the nuclear power in 1985 and 2003 was 22% and 17% relatively.
Interestingly, hydrogen leveled off at 4% for the whole course.
- Students perform better in school when they are rewared rather than punished To what extent do you agree Discuss both view and give your own opinion 90
- Some countries more and more people becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are reasons for this How can people research this 81
- Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and methods of preparation To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many companies sponser sports as a way to advertise themselves Some people think this is a good for the world of spory while others think it is negative Discuss both view and give your own opinion 89
- The bar chart below shows transport preferences among young people in four countries in a single year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, nonetheless, regarding, second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20809248555 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96479392321 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687861271676 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.460264305 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9090909091 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7272727273 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146552697483 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049336987451 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532503412477 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729955578537 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045881867228 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.