Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no compelling reason that we should let animals die out or exploit every last square meter of land in order to merely feed and accommodate the world's population. As not all species would be able to adapt quickly enough to restrain from extinction which is expected to perish if the government does not take definite actions to protect wildlife animals. This disappearance could even have far-reaching consequences. The first major risk is the loss of potential breakthroughs in human medicine. This is because certain animals could be an important study model for understanding diseases that cannot be researched in human bodies. A good illustration of it is polar bears having up to 11cm of fat underneath their skin which allows humans with comparative levels of that would anticipate obesity and suffer from diabetes and heart disease. Another reason is that most solutions for human fatal diseases that researchers do experiments with are on animals. If breeds of many species are shrinking, it would lead to food-chain reduction and an imbalance of nature, which also means that a new epidemic may become incurable due to a lack of the provision of accurate information.
Allocating more resources to protect wild animals and their existence would be beneficial to the nations that conserve them. Wildlife, zoos, and preservation areas that protect some of the rarest wild animals across the country would attract tourists to visit, which can then generate a large amount of income each year to the countries in charge. In addition, most of the cost for protecting wild animals is covered by various international funds all over the world. Therefore, protecting wildlife animals and their habitat are urgent actions to maintain the natural balance of our life rather than a burden to a country.
In conclusion, wild animals deserve to live freely under the protection of humans due to the significance/importance of their existence and the benefits they are bringing. We should take steps in everything we can to protect them for the sake of ourselves and our future generations
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-11 | Corn Cake | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | Corn Cake | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Aung | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | ielts_tony | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | Charles Le | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...rder to merely feed and accommodate the worlds population. As not all species would be...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, so, then, therefore, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14369501466 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96364164489 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598240469208 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0329439442 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.285714286 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3571428571 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164115018703 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568598998409 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475214278887 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118764826528 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473546194628 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.