Some people think that studying history is a waste of time while others think that it is essential to learn history. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
People have different points of view about the importance of learning history. While there are solid arguments for the triviality of history, I personally believe that it does teach us precious lessons.
On the one hand, I understand why some people think it is pointless to learn from the past. To begin with, history is a subject that is rarely used in people’s lives, and therefore, it would be more appropriate to focus on science or technology which is more relevant to the future and today’s society. Another reason is that it requires us to memorize dates, names, and facts when we study history, which have little use in our everyday life or for the future. For instance, Vietnamese students have to commit to memory all the information about a specific dynasty, which is monotonous and arduous. Consequently, it undervalues the significance of historical events as a subject for learning.
On the other hand, I would argue that studying past events is vital for two principal reasons. First of all, history helps young people have thorough insights into their own culture and how their culture and country have evolved. For example, in Vietnam, the youth need to comprehend how their ancestors defended the nation against invaders throughout many dynasties and maintained a sovereign and free country. As a result, not only does history develop their patriotism and pride, but it also gives people a sense of roots and belonging. Moreover, history depicts patterns of behaviour or events in the past and their outcome, hence helping people to avoid similar ones in the future.
In conclusion, some people think that studying history is worthless, whereas others believe that learning from the past is important to discover how we reached where we are these days. In light of both perspectives, I have to admit that history is certainly of value for our daily life as well as a grand future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-02 | Ha Chi Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | Ha Chi Nguyen | 61 | view |
- The prevention of health problems is more important than the development of new treatments the government should therefore invest more in prevention Government funding should reflect this To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph below shows the changes in UK birth rate of women in 6 different age groups from 1973 to 2008
- Some people think that studying history is a waste of time while others think that it is essential to learn history Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The table illustrates the all time top Olympics medal winners in several sports and the line graph depicts the number of rewards earned by five different countries in all Olympics 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...s certainly of value for our daily life as well as a grand future.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01572327044 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67462212223 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.092328758 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.928571429 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.5 7.06120827912 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228107863053 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076759490767 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695356792052 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141305713215 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686543480356 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.