Some people think that public health within a country can be improved by government making laws regarding nutritious food. Others, however, think that health is a matter of personal choice and responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Personal and public health are tightly related to food choices. While some people believe that the government should regulate nutrition to improve public wellness, others argue that it should be people’s decision whether to pursue a healthy diet or not. This essay will discuss both points of view and explain why the authorities should not control the types of food people can buy.
Legislators could impose laws concerning nutritious food in an effort to have a healthier population, therefore, decreasing public health costs. Even if this could be considered a good idea, it would be very quite difficult to implement. To achieve this target, the rulers could impose a levy on unhealthy food options, or reduce their availability on the grocery stores shelves. In Italy, for example, products such as carbonated sugary drinks and chips are heavily taxed. As a result, the sales of these items have decreased. However, if the authorities start to take control of what their citizens can or cannot eat, it may be seen as limitation of freedom.
Since personal freedom is an extremely important human right, many people think that they should be responsible for their choices regarding the food and drinks they decide to consume. I agree with this opinion because limiting nutritional options, even if it is done with the best outcome in mind, could consequently create dissatisfaction among the population, which would possibly lead to other public issues such as protests and demonstrations. A better approach could be educating the public about a healthy diet, which would help people make better-informed decisions about the food they consume. Many developed countries around the world employed this strategy and saw public health gains.
In conclusion, even though the government is able to control the dietary habits of its population through taxation and restrictions, healthier citizens and reduced public health expenses isn’t the only possible outcome. Limiting personal freedom could result in social unrest and for that reason diet decisions are better to be left up to well-informed individuals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-02 | Chinkiarora | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-02 | Đoàn Thanh Ngân | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-02 | ghazaleh Basiri | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | jasu | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-31 | dattu.vp79@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- Although the prices of fuels have greatly increased over the last decade or two it is argued that further increases in fuel prices are the only way to reduce world consumption of fuel and lessen pressure on the world s fuel resources To what extent do you 78
- Some people use the Internet to search for solutions to their medical problems Is it a positive or negative development Give your own opinion and examples from your experience 78
- In many countries around the world young people decide to leave their parents home once they finish school They start living on their own or sharing a house with friends Is this a positive or a negative development Give reasons for your answer and include 84
- Topic: The graph below shows the number of inquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peopled'?
Suggestion: peopled
...ellness, others argue that it should be people’s decision whether to pursue a healthy ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35928143713 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78380651033 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583832335329 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8434319226 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.333333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297721008516 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885921232585 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640569977162 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169831371424 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075304474206 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.