work 4 days of the week instead of 5 days of the week.
The reading specifies that it is better for employees to work four days of week instead of five days. However, the professor casts doubt on this claim and provides three reasons to reject the mentioned point in the reading.
First, based on the reading, employees feel more rested and alert by shortened workweek and because of that, the company does not need to hire additional persons to accomplish the same amount of work. In contrast, the lecturer says that declining the working hours is not beneficial for companies. In fact, the company should add new workers to their teams. This process will be costly for the company since not only the workers need health insurance but also they need computers and space to work in that environment.
Second, the article specifies that offering a lesser workweek will diminish the unemployment rate. Nevertheless, the professor implies that the mentioned rate will not be reduced because hiring is costly. Moreover, since the employees spend less time on work and the company would not hire any new members, it will force employees to work overtime to do their responsibilities which can be unpleasant for the employees.
Third, according to the reading, the option of a four-day workweek will enhance the quality of employees' life, because not only can spend extra time with their family but also, they can pursuing interests. On the other hand, the man explains that there is a risk that can reduce the quality of employees' work and job stability which can make them lose their job, especially in bad economic time. Also, since the supervision position needs to work 5 days in a week, the people will lose their chance to advance in their job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'pursue'
Suggestion: pursue
...me with their family but also, they can pursuing interests. On the other hand, the man e...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, third, in contrast, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94055944056 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53096863665 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6965094907 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200969644918 0.272083759551 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815572458252 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124778433296 0.0662205650399 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136444834605 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096560231666 0.0443174109184 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.