the graph below show the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 to 2005
The line chart gives information about the amount of money spent on books in four different countries Germany, France, Italy and Austria during period the time from 1995 to 2005.
Overall, what stands out from the chart is that there was an upward trend in the money used for books in France and Austria and a fluctuated trend in that of Germany and Italy.
The first obvious feature from the chart is that in 1995, the amount of money spent on books in Germany and France were high about 80 and 50 million dollars respectively while/whereas the data of Italy and Austria were shorter than two countries below.
From 1999 to 2003, people used money for books in Germany decreased slightly. In France, Italy, Austria, the amount of money spent on books rose remarkably by 10, 10 and 20 million dollars respectively in the same period. In 2005, people used money for books in four countries went up versus period before, especially the figure for Austria jumped dramatically by 40 million dollars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-13 | ngoc.tuyen | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-13 | ngoc.tuyen | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 to 2030 73
- The graph below show the average onumber of UK communters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 to 2020 73
- the graph below show the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 to 2005 78
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 to 2030 73
- the graph below show the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 to 2005 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ard trend in the money used for books in France and Austria and a fluctuated tren...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 829.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81976744186 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38717135415 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517441860465 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.8416392059 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.166666667 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396222070214 0.215688989381 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205616858937 0.103423049105 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757421690951 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253775036697 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059475476237 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.