the maps below show the centre of a small town of Islip as it is now and the plans for its development
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where possible
The given maps illustrate the current plan and the future plan of the refurbished centre of a small town called Islip.
Overall, after development, the new dual carriageway will connect all amenities of the town centre. Bus station, shopping centre, pedestrians only area are some features of the developmental plans.
At present, Islip town centre has a main road with two branch roads. Main road runs through the length of the town centre and shops are located on the both sides of the main road. Two road branching from west and east direction of the main road, ends in school and park respectively. Towards the south of the town centre couple of housing are located.
In the future developmental plan, Islip town centre has a new dual carriage way which encircles the whole town centre including the school and park. In addition, few additional amenities will be added, such as Bus station, Shopping centre, car park, couple of new housing all within the dual carriageway. Pedestrians only walking area will be in the middle of the town centre, faciliating for easy access of shops and other amenities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-25 | minhnhat2002 | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | Klinh2504 | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | Klinh2504 | 60 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | Klinh2504 | 60 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | sangeeth28 | 73 | view |
- nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organization why might this be the case what are the disadvantages of being self employed 67
- the plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after a refurbishment summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where possible 73
- the chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
- WRITING Write about the following topic A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagre 78
- some people feel that Criminial activities should be controlled by police force and not to use more radical measures to cleanse the root cause Discuss your opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9679144385 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59397427997 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540106951872 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0042853863 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201862874085 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925855962289 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741966369956 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136872324226 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746768249859 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.