In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations.
Undeniably, the advent of advanced medical technology significantly extends life expectancy, while it also accompanies a variety of negative outcomes. It is thus an urgent need for government to enact active and effective policies in order to eliminate public concerns.
Firstly, on the societal level, longer life adds to the burden of taxpayers. To be precise, an increasing budget for food supply and pensions leads to higher living expenses which may repress the younger and even pose a threat to economics. In addition, there is an extension of the retirement age, according to the newly published Chinese law, which will potentially exert a negative influence on the unemployment of the next generation. Secondly, with regard to the individuals, nursing elderly people often exhausts as well as restricts young workers' freedom in their leisure time. As a return to nurturing, time for taking care of parents with disabilities will occupy filial children’s spare time.
To address the roots of the problem, the government should invest more in the scientific researches of geriatrics. Financial aid to those families with more than one disabled parent is also crucial to reduce the burden of adults who take the moral responsibility. The community also bears the blame to establish a harmonious atmosphere which includes mediating the relationship between older people as well as avoiding the occurrences or missing to reduce the impact of aging populations.
In conclusion, society makes great efforts to diminish the disadvantages in terms of the lengthened average life. On the other hand, the public should not overestimate their drawbacks, and the positive effects cannot be ignored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-20 | Meomeo11 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | annaalysia007 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | ngo viet | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | ngo viet | 73 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your o 56
- The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011 100
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 547, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...ten exhausts as well as restricts young workers freedom in their leisure time. As a ret...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'missing reducing'.
Suggestion: missing reducing
... as well as avoiding the occurrences or missing to reduce the impact of aging populations. In co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41132075472 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00626141404 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649056603774 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8639900451 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5833333333 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144161559354 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443468483152 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0263795534047 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0751808805498 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219388191706 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.81 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.