Government should place few, if any restrictions on scientific research and development.
Scientific research is essesntial to make new discoveries; however there must be boundaries to the use of resources they need. As long as the research idea is not against humanity and is in the positive direction one can support it. Many of the most advanced medical treatments these days are based upon scientific researches.
Researches open the gateways to modern medicine. Most of the latest technologies are based uopn previous researches. From the use of antibiotics till the placement to ventricual assist devices (artificial hearts) are all based upon research. Recent pandemic, COVID-19, is an example of how researches work and how the scientest get one hypothesis after the other before the hypothesis becomes a theory; sometimes they fail, wasting all the resources, sometimes they achieve milestones. Either way they need resources, mostly government support for bigger experiments.
Despite all the benefits, there are massive set backs too. In the recent years, scientist were found to be unethically experimenting with animals. This is where humanity comes in, the hypothesis will indicate which direction scientist are leading to, and must be stopped right there if any animal violation is involved or if the research idea doesn’t have any positive impact on the society.
In conclusion, as with many things there are both benefits and flaws attached to the research too. Government must keep eye to where the resources are being used. Not every Scientific idea is worth spending resources for, neither all scientific ideas are to be discarded right away.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-07-01 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...c ideas are to be discarded right away.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 33.0505617978 21% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 249.0 442.535393258 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33734939759 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82331316725 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59437751004 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 704.065955056 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.2101066938 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9285714286 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7857142857 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157725100849 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515275650819 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330969076313 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978390293962 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216059343062 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.