Most people these days prefer getting news online to reading newspaper or watching TV. Do you think it is a positive development?
Nowadays citizens of all over the world are more curious to be aware of what is happening around the globe than they used to be in last decade. There are numerous sources that provides us the latest news such as newspaper, TV and online platforms, and it has been claimed that online platforms are the most favourable way by modern citizens. Although there are a number of issues associated with it, I completely hold the view that it is a beneficial progress due to the some compelling reasons which will be discussed in detail in this essay.
To begin with, this is an undeniable fact that majority of people are suffering from hectic lifestyle and shortage of time, but, at the same time, they desire to know about news. It is not possible for them to spending so much time on reading newspaper or watching TV. Thus, they prefer online news since it is convenient, speedy and time-saving. In this way, they would be know about the news as well as saving time. For example, it needs at least an hour to watch news or read a newspaper, whereas reading a page takes 15 minutes in the worst case.
Additionally, the importance of budget is by no means negligible. The amount of money which is needed to create content on TV and newspaper is noticeably higher compared to online sites. That is mainly because, there are more factors involved in these ways than online websites. Take newspaper as an example, in order to produce a newspaper, paper, journalist and various of machines are needed, while when it comes to online way, it only requires a mobile phone and internet access. Hence, the expense of the first way is relatively higher due to the cost of staff and material.
In conclusion, becoming aware of the events happening around the world is a vital need. There are two ways possible for this aim including TV or newspaper and online platforms which the latter way is the most popular way among people, and I personally assume this is a positive change because it requires less time as well as less budget.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-17 | Elahe Rasooli | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-14 | Komaldeep | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-14 | Komaldeep | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | Komaldeep | 67 | view |
| 2021-03-12 | huutrungqz | 84 | view |
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of 6 years 78
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The diagrams below show the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at home for the year 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accomodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some People Believe That Teenagers Should Concentrate On All School Subjects But Others Believe That Teenage Should Focus On The Subject That They Are Best At Or That They Find The Most Interest to what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 472, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
... it is a beneficial progress due to the some compelling reasons which will be discus...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66480446927 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51578456915 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54748603352 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9987914102 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8666666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212762622177 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068501088841 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596928285879 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117141484947 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391880743804 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.