Scientists and other researchers should focus their research that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people
According to this verbal expression, the primary goal of scientific study should be to promote human welfare. I'm sure there are a plethora of people that accede with me. Whenever a scientific breakthrough has availed the general public in resolving a pressing issue, it has been lauded. People revere those who have had a consequential impact on their life, whether it's the revelation of penicillin or the invention of the light bulb. Because environmental difficulties, sickness, and energy constraints are all paramount, scientists aren't obligated to prioritise human health.
The paramountcy of public health research cannot be overstated for the entire human population. Without medication, electricity, and automobiles, people would not live past 60, and they would not be able to go out at night or drive 10 miles to meet friends. Medicine, electricity, and automobiles have all transmuted our lives for the preponderant.
Environmental issues, on the other hand, are a top priority for us. Our lives were revolutionised by the Industrial Revolution and subsequent technological revolutions. However, our circumventions have altered. Forest overexploitation and oil spills have ruined natural ecosystems and transmuted the bodies of numerous creatures. Even if it does not directly damage humans, environmental degradation has an impact on human development. The quantity of victuals accessible to other species in the pabulum chain diminishes as a result of over-exploitation of forests. As a result, scientists must now concentrate their efforts on environmental issues. Many research projects fixating on terrestrial renovation, habitat reconstruction, and imperilled species conservation can avail the ecosystem and biodiversity
Keep in mind that our actions have a direct impact on our health. Our current issues are not the same as those faced by our predecessors, and future generations' concerns cannot be addressed in the same way. Industrialization and capitalism have resulted in increased pollution, which is to blame for many of today's woes. Respiratory and hearing problems are caused by increased air and noise pollution. Certain diseases are more prevalent today than they were a few decades ago. Smallpox, which affected many of our forefathers, has, however, been eradicated. Limiting research on an issue because it is unknown today is a particularly short-termist tactic.
The author also fails to recognise that scientific progress does not always result in a predetermined outcome or advantage. For example, the radio was created specifically for the US Navy. In rural areas and poor countries, radio is the most popular source of entertainment and information. Similarly, the full potential of commercial dye was only realised once it was adopted by the fashion industry. It paved the path for many people to pursue a career in chemistry as a business. Unintended discoveries are ignored in the author's perspective. If Sir Alexander Fleming had just focused on bigger issues, he would not have discovered penicillin.
A number of subjects must be considered before the research scope question can be answered. To make a choice, all of the above points of view must be considered.
In conclusion, It's reasonable to expect researchers to concentrate their efforts on topics that will benefit society, but the disadvantages outweigh the benefits. Such a programme may actually impede good discoveries by lowering the synergistic effect of multidisciplinary research and reducing general scientific ardour.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | Sagar1234567890 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | TiOluwani97 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | shubham1102 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-01 | wikoxa7293@ekcsoft.com | 50 | view |
| 2023-01-03 | abhikhanna | 62 | view |
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people 62
- Unfortunately in contemporary society creating an appealing image has become more Cmportant than the reality or truth behind that image Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 16
- Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States Only about 2 percent of customers have complained indicating that 98 people out of 100 are happy with the change Furthermore many server 68
- Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out while others say that we should concentrate more on problems human beings Discuss both sides and give 50
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...udy should be to promote human welfare. Im sure there are a plethora of people tha...
^^
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...scientific breakthrough has availed the general public in resolving a pressing issue, it has b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...equential impact on their life, whether its the revelation of penicillin or the inv...
^^^
Line 1, column 536, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...nstraints are all paramount, scientists arent obligated to prioritise human health. ...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 526, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...intended discoveries are ignored in the authors perspective. If Sir Alexander Fleming h...
^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 111, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...tion can be answered. To make a choice, all of the above points of view must be considered...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, may, similarly, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3014.0 2235.4752809 135% => OK
No of words: 538.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60223048327 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35477709745 2.79657885939 120% => OK
Unique words: 316.0 215.323595506 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587360594796 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 958.5 704.065955056 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3544558507 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.303030303 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174028424631 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335483739668 0.0831039109588 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426768609553 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794601497719 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439007416492 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.38706741573 119% => OK
difficult_words: 188.0 100.480337079 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.