The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
The pie-chart illustrates what graduates of Anthropology from an institution did after completing their undergraduate study and the table provides data on the amount earned by working anthropologists after five years in three kinds of employment.
Overall, Anthropology graduates mostly went on to either full or part-time work postgraduation and most of the employed anthropologists earned more than $75,000 after five years in the industry.
While more than half of the graduates were fully employed, approximately 20% were into only part-time jobs or combined with postgraduate studies. Less than a tenth of these graduates furthered into postgraduate studies fully, likewise the proportion of those whose outcomes remained unknown. Surprisingly, 12% of the degree-holder were unemployed.
Anthropologists went on to work in the government, as freelance consultants, or in private companies. Five years in the working sphere, exactly 50% of those employed by the government earned $100,000+ whereas only 40% of freelance consultants and 30% of private anthropologists’ salaries were within this range. Interestingly, a larger proportion of private companies’ anthropologists earned between $50,000 and $74,999, while only 5% of the government workers and freelance anthropologists were paid the least at less than $50,000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | view | |
| 2023-10-05 | dhphuc7866 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | steveminh | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | Bùi Xuân Tiến | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Dipesh1234 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 67
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers What factors do you think influence these decisions Do we become used to bad news Would it be better if more good news was reported 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 65
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89637305699 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.54541984527 2.65546596893 134% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580310880829 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0082025643 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.25 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261450504781 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113450626042 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126106326095 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18544624105 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144111519447 0.0819641961636 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.24 11.4140731707 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89637305699 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.54541984527 2.65546596893 134% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580310880829 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0082025643 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.25 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261450504781 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113450626042 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126106326095 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18544624105 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144111519447 0.0819641961636 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.24 11.4140731707 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.