Some people think high school graduates should travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to study at university. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches.
It is believed that there should be a study break for students to have a thirst for adventure before enrolling at university. This essay will discuss both pros and cons of both approaches in the following paragraphs.
Undeniably, there are multifarious advantages of spending a year working or travelling before going to university, but the main benefit is that they can get practical exposure which will help them to be an eye-opener in the field they pay attention to. it is because they can learn problem-solving skills and also devote more time to hone academic knowlegdes. As a result, they can learn important skills to be better prepared for their future career. For example, a recent survey illustrates that the percentage of youngsters have been increasing steadily who prefer to challenge themselves by doing a task or visiting other nations to discover a new thing before entering tertiary education.
On the other hand, one main drawback of this aspect is that they feel easily left out. For this reason, provided that they are the only one in their friendship group taking a year-off, they will be aware that their friends are moving on without them so that it will lead to the “peer pressure” phenomena. For instance, people who are one year behind everyone, might feel they are stuck in place because they are graduating later and starting full-time work later. that can create immense depression and boredom for them.
In conclusion, although the midterm experience between the school and the university gives them access to more and better job opportunities, it may result in hindrances towards a goal. Therefore, a learning exposure is an a crucial way to follow up their life’s target.
- Some people think high school graduates should travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to study at university Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches 78
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...essure” phenomena. For instance, people who are one year behind everyone, might feel t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people who are one year behind everyone, might feel they are stuck in place becau...
^^
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...ater and starting full-time work later. that can create immense depression and bored...
^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'creates'.
Suggestion: creates
...starting full-time work later. that can create immense depression and boredom for them...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'an' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: an; a
...goal. Therefore, a learning exposure is an a crucial way to follow up their life’s t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07042253521 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7832140593 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609154929577 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0313492778 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160273232261 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562163234348 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501477119687 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100921857746 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658935104432 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.