The bar chart shows active participation rates in top ten sports in Canada in 1998 and 2005
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the comparison between the two years, 1998 and 2005, in terms of the proportion of Canadians who participated in several sports, such as tennis, cycling, soccer, and so on. Overall, it can be seen that golf and ice hockey were the two most attractive sports in Canada, whereas tennis, cycling, and skiing attracted the least number of players over the period given. Additionally, almost all the participation rates in 2005 were lower than in 1998, except for soccer.
Looking at the graph, the data indicate that in 1998, the figure for golf participants was the highest, at nearly 25%, followed by people who play ice hockey and baseball, with 18% and 17%, respectively. The fourth most popular sport was swimming, with almost 13% of players. The rest of the sports, namely tennis, cycling, alpine skiing, volleyball, basketball, and soccer, witnessed a fairly similar proportion, in the middle of 7% and 9%.
In 2005, although the percentages of participants who play golf and ice hockey diminished by 2% each, these sports were still ranked as the lion's share of choices, with 21% and 17%. Baseball observed a significant fall from 17% to 6%. Besides, remaining sports such as tennis, cycling, downhill, and alpine skiing, volleyball, basketball, and swimming had a drop of about 1% to 2% in the proportion of Canadians who played them. An opposite trend could be seen in that the figure for soccer players rose slightly by 2%, to reach approximately 10% of Canadians who preferred this sport as their leisure time activity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | chau hoang | view | |
| 2023-08-30 | chau hoang | view | |
| 2021-11-30 | adamneyul | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-21 | sharanbhullar | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-21 | sharanbhullar | 73 | view |
- The table below shows population figures for four countries for 2003 and projected figure for 2025 and 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The pie charts show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003 84
- The chart shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops opening in a country from 2011 to 2018 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 20
- In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The tables give information about the average hours work by part time and full time men and women in three countries in Europe in 2002 and compare them with the European countries 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, so, still, whereas, except for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 259.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02316602317 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74950648853 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579150579151 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2674856613 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.1 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131358966361 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539153417489 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515441814711 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0938126369174 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582430484441 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.