The bar chart shows the percentage of people in the United Kingdom per age group without any qualifications.
The bar chart provides information about the percentage of people in different age groups and genders that have no qualifications in the UK in 2009.
Overall, at young age, the percentage of men was higher than women, however this pattern was reserved in the elder groups. It is also noticeable that the proportion was equal in the 25-29 and 30-39 years old group.
In both age group 17-19 and 20-24, men proportion was slightly higher than their counterpart in comparison. To be precise, the figure was around 7 to 8% for male, while the female figure was just about 6 to 7%. Unexpectedly, these numbers was identical at age 25-29 and 30-39 group, with 8%.
In contrast, after the age 39, the proportion of people who held no qualification increased noticeably. In 40-49 years old group, the pattern was reserved as there was lower percentage in men than women, 10% and 11% respectively. Regard the final group, where people are over 50 years old, the total number was even bigger and the gap between genders was wider. That is to say, women proportion increased to 20%, which is about 3% higher than men percentage at the same age.
- The bar chart shows the number of male and female people arrested by type of offence crime Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The flow chart shows trampling the negative effect of tourists walking in the countryside for the environment Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 78
- The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK 78
- How should we ensure that the television is a positive influence in the life of children 73
- The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, in contrast, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78282828283 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63675545678 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565656565657 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.9654949843 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.7 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191308021943 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094768645484 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830619609528 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157303757108 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100605887802 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.