The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in
2004 and 2009.
Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts illustrate the major transportations of students going to university between two 2004 and 2009.
During the period of the research, as can be seen from the graph, the ratio of car accounted for the most impressive number in 2004, meanwhile in 2009 the highest percentage was bus. Contrastly, using train reached a bottom.
In 2004, there was a significant rate in car and made up over a half. In contrast, the figure for train and walking comprised a small fraction. Furthermore, the data about using bus was 33%.
In 2009, the most noticeable feature in the chart is a variance about methods of transport. The proportion of car dropped tremendously from 51% to 28%. However, using car soar quickly by 13% and reached a peak in this year. By contrast, the figure about train hit the lowest point from 2004 to 2009. In addition, there was a slight increase in the rate of bicycle as well as walking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows how people buy music 78
- Shops in the countryside are fewer and fewer so people tend to go to the stores in the towns and cities and the lead to their inconvenient life Car use also causes pollution Is this phenomenon more harmful than the end 61
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 78
- The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2006 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reached a bottom. In 2004, there was a significant rate in car and made up ov...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, in addition, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 767.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73456790123 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69467600436 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586419753086 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0953651512 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.7272727273 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7272727273 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136247375433 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507551315864 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717932690806 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091040337816 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549911277496 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.56 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.