Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good member of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both views and give your opimion.
Recently, the question whether parents or school should take responsibility to teach children to become good citizens remains a source of controversy. Some people believe that families define who we are going to become while others assume that school are liable to teach us morality and guide us toward a better future. Personally, I agrue that parents should be more responsible.
On the one hand, School should take responsibility for educating children right attitudes in their lives and decent morality to become a good member of the overall society. This is due to the fact that children spend most of their time in school and school are considered as second home of them. Teachers also have significant influence on children. Beside teaching academic lessons, teachers offer standard expectations that society has for people, provide ideas, knowledge for children to avoid wrong behaviours. Moreovers, it's also necessary for children to meet other people from varying backgrounds. This will help them broaden knowledge about society and teach them respect other people. Clearly, school is the best environment for children to contact to many others.
On the other hand, I believe that parents play more crucial role in development of children in their early childhood. Firstly, families are the first school of children where they develop personalities such as honesty, obedience, hard-working. Children are gulliable and under the sole custody of parents, therefore, they more likely imitate their parent's behaviours, speech and lifestyle which definitely affect all aspects of their life. Secondly, it's also essential for parents to imbibe righteous perspective into their children at the beginning. It's nothing less than creating a masterpiece on a blank cavan before it is comtaminated. Hence, parents have an undeniable role in teaching children the concepts of good, evil and moral values.
In conclusion, the efforts invested toward nuturing the younger generation should be shared for everyone, but it seems to me that families should take heavier reponsibility.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-08 | Hoang Mung | 78 | view |
| 2018-04-30 | rimanpreet | 87 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationship people make Has this become a positive or negative development 78
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is dissappearing What are the reason and what are the impacts 61
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sport or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views and 73
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the cause of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extend do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
Recently, the question whether parents or school should take responsib...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as for, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45962732919 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81598083813 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6102362972 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.411764706 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05882352941 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287739595704 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929668466704 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444093416589 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16852149112 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688421315247 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.