The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem?
The environment is becoming more contaminated currently for a variety of reasons, one of which is the increased production of customer items. There are various causes for this, and there are several methods that can be used to solve the problem.
It is obvious that several factors influencing the creation of commodities have gotten a lot of attention. The most visible proof is that factories dump sewage into the water and emit exhaust fumes into the atmosphere. In fact, the manufacturing of goods requires the emission of waste materials, which have negative impacts on the environment. Furthermore, the existence of factories and businesses degrades natural areas such as woods and communities. For example, in a rural part of Vietnam, a great number of trees were chopped in order to build factories to produce iron, which is used in the production of automobiles. As a result, residents will lose a quantity of Oxygen from the trees.
There are several options for reducing the negative consequences. To begin, governments should enact rigorous rules concerning the disposal of waste to industries. If the amount of waste and exhaust fumes produced surpasses the regulation limit, the manufacturers or businesses must be penalized. As a result, governments will be able to control waste and reduce pollution. Second, governments can urge and encourage factories to cultivate plants, as well as encourage residents to do so. The factories must grow an equal number of trees in the areas where they have caused damage. As a result, the number of trees can be balanced.
To summarize, the problem arises from various of factors, and a variety of solutions can help alleviate the harmful effects on the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-08 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | quynhanhbuiviet | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
- More and more people are choosing to eat healthy food and making time to exercise regularly Why and what can we do to encourage this 84
- Some people believe women are better leaders than men To which extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Research has shown that the transportation of products and people are the main source of pollution Some people believe government should be in charge of this while others believe it is the fault of individuals Discuss both view and give your opinion 84
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
- There is evidence that inhaling cigarette smoke causes health problems not only for smokers but for non smokers who inhale other people s smoke In view of this smoking should be banned in all public places even though this would restrict some people s fre 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, so, well, for example, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18279569892 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96235203938 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537634408602 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9267658146 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.375 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182450994232 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570795338628 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740811665619 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117463607893 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871033290808 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.