The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The given bar chart shows the distribution of the country's trade in discrete categories during different time frames ( 2015 and 2016 ). The units are calibrated in dollar amount.
Overall, the income generated in trading to different country's in 2016 is higher than that of 2015. Moreover, Textile industry has shown a good amount of percentage jump among all other industries.
Whereas, Gems and jewellery category has seen a slight drop in the same year compared to that of previous year.
The graph is divided into two different categories. One with a percentage increase and one with a decrease. Petroleum and products, Engineered goods have seen a gain of 3% and
8.5% each compared to previous time frame. Moreover, Agricultural products has seen a slight growth by 0.81% and textile industry is largely impacted by expanding 15.24% compared to
preceding time.
However, Gems and Jewellery revenue has been reduced by 5.18% in contrast to all other industry in the year 2016.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-11 | vanditaverma.v@gmail.com | view |
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
- The chart below shows the proportion of male and female students studying six art related subjects at a UK university in 2011
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries 56
- The diagram shows the the life cycle of flowering plants 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iven bar chart shows the distribution of the countrys trade in discrete categorie...
^^
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... categories during different time frames 2015 and 2016 . The units are calibrated...
^^
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ing different time frames 2015 and 2016 . The units are calibrated in dollar amou...
^^
Line 4, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...industries. Whereas, Gems and jewellery category has seen a slight drop in the ...
^^
Line 4, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wellery category has seen a slight drop in the same year compared to that of pre...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, well, whereas, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20625 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70219887972 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1425667816 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258434992204 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905176876278 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100829289239 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118175987804 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812658880992 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.