The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart indicates the occupation of electricity procession materials in four countries, including India, Sweden, Morocco and Vietnam over the six-year period, from 2003 to 2008. Overall, the proportion of hydropower in Morocco, fossil fuel in India and nuclear power in Sweden dominated the consumption of these sources in other countries.
Initially, Vietnam showed preferences in using hydro and fossil power, and it seemed that fossil fuel accounted for major of Vietnam electricity component, around 56%, however, it was less than India’s quantity, which was approximately 82%. Meanwhile, Sweden and Morocco both witnessed a minor proportion of fossil fuel, less than one-twentieth.
India and Sweden were the only two countries that consumed nuclear power as a material of electricity procession among four nations, 4% and 44% respectively. At the same time, hydropower experienced the highest figure in Morocco, occupied for about 95%, followed by Sweden with more than a half of the ratio, and this source was also the rest sole of electricity supply in Vietnam, contributing to 44% of the entire quantity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-19 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-19 | nobitaa | view | |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
- Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- The diagram below shows the development of the cutting tool in the Stone Age Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The diagrams illustrate the process of building an igloo 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49425287356 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94665658743 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626436781609 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.6127783175 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.333333333 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0904870840414 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476270642088 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341701424385 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0647075576796 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261263081563 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 61.2550243902 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.06136585366 126% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.