The charts below provide information on popular modes of transport in the city of Cambridge for the years 2008 and 2018. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The given pie chart illustrates the distribution of four various popular modes of transport in the city of Cambridge. The information provided are in two different time frames mainly in the year 2008 and 2018.
Overall, we can observe that people in cambridge were more concerned about their health and fitness over the last decade as Walking and Bicycle collectively are contributing more than a half percent of all the commute modes in 2018.
In terms of the most significant feature of the chart in the year 2008, the highest category of commuting was through cars, which accounted for 42% of the total transportation form. However, this had been reduced considerably in the year 2018, reaching to 20%. Additionally, the next major segment of the population travelling through public transport, busses showed a slight reduction over the last decade from 30% in 2008 to 25% in 2018.
In stark contrast, people of cambridge increased the usage of bicycle and change from 17% to 30% was showcased . This trend was joined by people who used to walk and a sharp increase of more than double in the percentage was observed, starting with 11% to 25% in last 10 years was noted. Of particular note is that these two modes collectively made up to 55% of Cambridge's commute mode in 2018.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-13 | vanditaverma.v@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2021-06-06 | chathurika2008@gmail.com | view | |
| 2021-06-06 | chathurika2008@gmail.com | 100 | view |
| 2020-10-28 | Rereirf | 75 | view |
| 2020-10-28 | Rereirf | 87 | view |
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 73
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of this mobility outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The diagram shows the the life cycle of flowering plants 61
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries 56
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ibuting more than a half percent of all the commute modes in 2018. In terms of the most ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ting more than a half percent of all the commute modes in 2018. In terms of th...
^^
Line 8, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge of bicycle and change from 17% to 30% was showcased . This trend was joined by...
^^
Line 8, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nd change from 17% to 30% was showcased . This trend was joined by people who use...
^^
Line 8, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and a sharp increase of more than double in the percentage was observed, starting...
^^
Line 8, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... particular note is that these two modes collectively made up to 55% of Cambridge...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1074.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90410958904 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73361384034 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602739726027 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9582840819 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.333333333 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225391524931 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994201074624 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738872432479 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146223568069 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101738204814 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.