Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Today we live in a global village, and there is prevailing a good understanding among countries around the globe. Developed countries always stand beside the developing or poor countries at the time of their need. Thereby, they provide various kinds of help upon their request. The rich nations often give financial help to poor countries to improve their condition, but such financial support sometimes cannot change the situation. Therefore, people think that rich countries should provide other types of assistance to the poorer ones. I support this statement, and my inclinations will be discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.
To begin with, among all the reasons, the rich countries should not give direct economical help to poor countries, the most important one is corruption. Rather they can offer other kinds of support to develop it's infrastructure such as shelters for homeless people, construct roads and bridges and so on. This is because, by doing so the donor countries can have a direct monitoring opportunities of their work.
Furthermore, developed countries can provide modern medical instruments to poor countries. For example, during the coronavirus pandemic poor countries needed sufficient test kits to detect the number of actual patients and medicine to tackle the terrible situation of death. At this point, medical support was urgent than cash.
Moreover, rich countries can help a poor country by providing food. To support this, when a country face famine it needs sufficient amount of food to feed its hungry population. Thus, developed countries can reduce the number of unfortunate death from hunger.
To conclude it can be said that, monetary aid is not an effective method of support. Instead of that other kinds of assistance such us developing infrastructure, providing education, healthcare, and food are of great importance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... such financial support sometimes cannot change the situation. Therefore, people ...
^^
Line 2, column 154, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
..., the most important one is corruption. Rather they can offer other kinds of support t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... us developing infrastructure, providing education, healthcare, and food are of g...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39726027397 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88330132557 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595890410959 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8379667614 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7058823529 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1764705882 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398499319597 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134807557824 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104368540349 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217397443667 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108263338358 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.