Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole.
Discuss this viewpoint and give your own opinion.
Eating not meat has been in vouge these days. Many people prefer not to consume animals. These people believe that it can give many advantages to the body as well as generating better world to live in.
Consuming no meat of fish is good for health. Since beef and fish contained a plethora of saturated fat and colestrol, they can harm human body in a long term. On the other hand, vegetables is the best food to replace meet in order to give enough nutritiens to the body. For instance, sheep contains more colestrol than the body needed, therefore, for some people who experienced certain diseases related to colestrol are dissallowed to consume sheeps. As a result, for those who do not consume beef or fish they have good metabolism and healthier body. Thus, I believe that eat no fish or meat can generate a healthy life.
Furthermore, not eating animals can effectively rebuild the unbalanced food chain. Because of the rapid increase in fast food industry, there are more chickens slayed everyday leaving imbalance in the food chain; hence, eating no chickens or other meat will fix this problem. In several areas in Indonesia, there are groups of people campaigning about not consuming chickens because there is a significant increase in the population of worms disturbing the harvest process. This is only one tiny example about what is going to happen if we keep still consuming animals. While numbers of animals are sacrifying everyday to fulfill people needs, the hidden disaster might be happened in the future bringing a serious threat to humankind. The more animals we eat, the worse the food chain is.
To sum up, I personally think that consuming no beef, chicken or fish is necessary for generating healthy life and healthy world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-23 | emjhie | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-14 | Tryputra 17 | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-13 | Killua | 61 | view |
| 2021-12-13 | Revivo Tulaseket | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-13 | Revivo Tulaseket | 78 | view |
- Research indicates that the characteristics we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any experiences we may have in our life Which do you consider to be the major influence 79
- Group eam activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone Do you agree or disagree 78
- In some countries more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this question 67
- Many people say that the only way to guarantee getting a good job is to complete a course of university education Others claim that it is better to start work after school and gain experience in the world of work How far do you agree or disagree with the 78
- Some people think that due to improvements in technology traditional skills of writing letters will disappear do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 608, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve that eat no fish or meat can generate a healthy life. Furthermore, not eatin...
^^
Line 3, column 611, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...While numbers of animals are sacrifying everyday to fulfill people needs, the hidden dis...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91245791246 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55553559301 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565656565657 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0590574115 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1875 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233377910588 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793892066418 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554467189257 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13396914258 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390558406047 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.