Some people think that killing animals for food is cruel, but others claim that animals are a necessary part of the diet. What's your opinion?
Nowadays, it is a widespread practice that butchering animals for consumption is a ruthless act. Although it has been condemned, some people argue that meat is an instrumental role in a nutritious diet. To the best of my knowledge, consuming adequate nutrients is critical to human health and well-being, and I am greatly in favor of the following reasons.
Firstly, it is vital to note that food of animal origin provides a wide range of nutrients that are essential for good health conditions. Studies have shown that, although it is invisible, inadequate consumption of these nutrients can cause adverse outcomes on people's health, such as malnutrition. Therefore, it will be a serious mistake to neglect the fact that a diet with a good combination of meat and vegetables is considered to have significant value. For example, the absence of seafood (which includes calcium, minerals, vitamins, and proteins) frequently causes negative effects on health such as poor growth, dysfunction of body parts, and difficulty recovering from injury. This example illustrates the fact that consuming meat is particularly advantageous for the health of consumers.
Secondly, the counter-argument of these objectors is that it is unethical to slaughter animals for meat for the reason that it causes painful experiments on livestock and poultry. This point of view is appropriate to some extent; however, it is incomplete. What they fail to yield into account is the fact that with the extensive and widespread application of contemporary engineering technology in industrial processes it is possible to reduce or eliminate animal anguish. A telling example is that in numerous developed countries, industrial farmers are required to use novel technologies, such as gas chambers and anesthetics, to alleviate pain in livestock and poultry. Consequently, Based on this example, we can observe that the slaughter of animals for human consumption can be humane.
In conclusion, from the preceding discussion, although killing animals for meat has long been strongly evaluated on moral grounds, it is vital to people’s health. However, it is my opinion that acknowledgments to state-of-the-art technologies, the slaughter of animals for food could be philanthropic.
- Nowadays some older people choose to live in retirement communities with other older people rather than living with their adult children Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Some people argue that the government should spend money on public services and facilities but not on the arts Do you agree or disagree 84
- Newspapers are having enormous influence on people ideas and opinions Why is this case Is it a positive or negative situation 89
- Some people think that killing animals for food is cruel but others claim that animals are a necessary part of the diet What s your opinion 73
- Some people think that killing animals for food is cruel but others claim that animals are a necessary part of the diet What s your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2924751422 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536931818182 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6653943835 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.066666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233085901854 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789046688004 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583833878813 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153754426577 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535144913291 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.