The bar charts below show the Marriage and Divorce Statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994.
Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
Write at least 150 words.
the bar charts demonstrate the marriage and devoiced statics in eight varying countries throughout the period of 1981 and 1994. The surveyed nations include the USA, UK, JAPAN, FINLAND, GERMANY, FRANCE, ITALY, DENMARK. It was clear that from graph the number of marriages in all of nations had a sharp decline over the period survey. However, there seems to a rise of divorces case.
The bar chart represents the rate of marriage in USA was the highest in compression with other nations. Which was exceeded at 10 per thousand of people. In 1994, the number was approximately at 9 per thousand in USA and in other nations were stand at approximately 5 per thousand excluding Denmark that highest rate at 7 per thousand. In 1981, all of the nations were standing at over the 6 per thousands of people but the lowest number rate it belonged to Denmark that was stopped at 5 per thousand.
In 1981, Germany and Finland recorded almost the same rate a little more than 6 per thousand. Still a significant drop was recorded in both of these nations in another period. In Finland the number it was a fall at 5 per thousand and still the Germany was higher 1 per thousand rather than Finland.
Also from Divorce statics, it can be clear that the USA highest number of divorced at 5 per thousand of people in 1981. The lowest number of divorced were resigned in Italy at the two different period. In Germany the rate of divorced were stability at 2 per thousand all over the two years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-14 | Manideep Macherla | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-20 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-05 | mido2070 | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | Surbhi96 | 67 | view |
| 2021-06-17 | Trangdodo | 67 | view |
- The bar charts below show the Marriage and Divorce Statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994 Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Write at least 150 words 67
- Nowadays many people want to buy famous brands of clothes cars and other items what are the reasons for this do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries China and India Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data Write at least 150 words 58
- Nowadays many people want to buy famous brands of clothes cars and other items what are the reasons for this do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- Some people believe that it is wrong to keep animals in zoos while others think that zoos are both entertaining and ecologically important Discuss both views 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the bar charts demonstrate the marriage and...
^^^
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hest in compression with other nations. Which was exceeded at 10 per thousand of peop...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 242, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'stood'.
Suggestion: stood
...ousand in USA and in other nations were stand at approximately 5 per thousand excludi...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 344, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ighest rate at 7 per thousand. In 1981, all of the nations were standing at over the 6 per...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rk that was stopped at 5 per thousand. In 1981, Germany and Finland recorded almo...
^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...rate a little more than 6 per thousand. Still a significant drop was recorded in both...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...r 1 per thousand rather than Finland. Also from Divorce statics, it can be clear t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1218.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61363636364 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52874884223 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450757575758 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5775664492 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35714285714 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108745916403 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540879919223 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510479136156 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809802169084 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038147364473 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the bar charts demonstrate the marriage and...
^^^
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hest in compression with other nations. Which was exceeded at 10 per thousand of peop...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 242, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'stood'.
Suggestion: stood
...ousand in USA and in other nations were stand at approximately 5 per thousand excludi...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 344, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ighest rate at 7 per thousand. In 1981, all of the nations were standing at over the 6 per...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rk that was stopped at 5 per thousand. In 1981, Germany and Finland recorded almo...
^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...rate a little more than 6 per thousand. Still a significant drop was recorded in both...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...r 1 per thousand rather than Finland. Also from Divorce statics, it can be clear t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1218.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61363636364 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52874884223 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450757575758 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5775664492 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35714285714 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108745916403 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540879919223 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510479136156 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809802169084 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038147364473 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.