The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007
The line graph illustrates the proportion of four different car ownership in households use (one car, no car, two cars, and three or more cars) in the UK over a period of 36 years.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the proportion of households having more than one car. In contrast, the number of households that own one car and no car witnessed a downward trend.
As it can be seen from the graph, the number of households with three or more cars plateaued between 1971 and 1975, standing at roughly 2%. After this period, the figure increased gradually to just under 10% in 2007. Similarly, the proportion of households with two cars tripled from roughly 8% in 1971 to nearly 25% in 2007.
In 1971, almost half of all British households did not have regular use of a car. However, there was a significant plummet in the percentage of households that did not own a car after 1971, from approximately 50% to just around 25% in 2007. In the same pattern, the proportion of households with one car rose to its peak at around 45% before witnessing a slight dip to 42% in the last year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2023-06-14 | hieu13092006 | view | |
| 2022-10-12 | DOT BABA | 78 | view |
- Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work Other employers see no benefit in doing so Consider the arguments from both aspects of 89
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 84
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 82
- The map below shows the changes that have taken place in Meadowside village and Fonton a neighbouring town since 1962 73
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5404040404 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60275512709 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535353535354 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1504702039 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8888888889 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244766170342 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117345438051 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621377275723 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163784519009 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528960263369 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.