Many companies invest their money in sports games for advertisement purposes. Some people think it is good for the sports world, while others believe that it has some disadvantages. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The trend towards allocating resources to advertisement in the sports industry is gaining popularity in the business world. Notwithstanding the commercial benefits for economic entities and financial advantages for sport games organizers, I contend that this is a negative development and directly affects the purity of sports.
For one thing, the heavy investment from private organizations has eliminated financial constraints for the match creators in many aspects. Specialized sports equipment such as sportgears and sportswear are now sponsored by private sectors, who could also be actively involved in upgrading sport amenities such as stadiums. This support will provide the best conditions for the athletes to participate and offer the spectators a sense of satisfaction while immersing in the sporting spirit of live matches with comfortable seats and full of services. Labels in billboards around the arenas or product placement such as on players' uniforms could instill in the viewers the brand’s name, which is profoundly beneficial to the businesses’ reputation during market expansion.
For another, I believe that mass collaborations with individual companies could entail a reduction in focus on the actual sport. The inherent intangible purposes of traditional sports games are players’ happiness when reaching the pinnacle of sports and competitive attitudes towards others. However, the rapid commercialization has turned matches and events into opportunities to advertise products and promote brand awareness. Viewers’ experiences are now disturbed with overbright players’ jerseys or advertisement bombardments by posters around the stadium. Furthermore, players are profit driven when celebrity endorsement is a lucrative industry, providing ample opportunities to enhance their images as brands are in need of representative faces. However, this could affect their sporting spirit and professionalism, gradually losing interest in the games comparing the salary of a sportsman with an illustrious star and finally result in poor quality games for viewers.
To conclude, regardless of the financial benefits for the organizers, I believe the true value of sports could be threatened by commercialization. There should be a limit on advertising in order to maintain the spirit of sports and to gear public attention towards sporting pursuit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-26 | sonnn | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-15 | Nguyễn Xuân Sơn | 89 | view |
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people believe that no one should do the same job for all their working life Others argue that doing the same job brings advantages for individuals companies and society Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on important subjects Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The bar chart shows the number of visitors to four London museums 73
- Economic growth in recent years made some people in both developed countries and developing countries richer However research shows that while people in developing countries are happier people in developed countries seem not happier than before What does 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...ating resources to advertisement in the sports industry is gaining popularity in the b...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, still, while, such as, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89306358382 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29979972197 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601156069364 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4215505956 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.642857143 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275114838453 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957270922774 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538546767885 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174265149486 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018922740807 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.81 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.