Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and giv

Essay topics:

Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers. Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Accordingly, critical sentiments given to educationalists are believed to accompany disrespect and could potentially break the formal doctrine, otherwise, it is essential to some people for the justification of educational betterment. I contend that in order to drive the existing conventional teaching methods for improving quality, criticism is important, given the right contexts.

For one, the view of criticizing contradicts moral and ethical behavior could be explained by several reasons, chief of which is the ramification of spoiled generations. Being allowed to confess their thinking to the tutor with a certain degree of respect, adolescents at rebellious phase often pose flexibility and even give trenchant comments with their out-of-control emotions. Occasionally, this is due to the fact that their deep internal sense of psychological satisfaction needs to be justified through verbal language, combining with actions such as hand gestures or upholded tonation to express the feeling of stress accumulating from daily discontent. For instance, there is student bias in some classes, leading to a sense of misery among the others, given the lack of confidence to compete with the superior one - the teacher’s favor and comments in this context could turn into arguments if teachers show no changes in their attitudes. Consequently, there will be immorality and impulsiveness in students' behavior and disciplines could be losing gradually.

For another, I still hold the view that students should have a right to give suggestions for adjustments in academic environments under the governance of regulations to ensure the teaching quality. Apparently, students could trigger the misunderstanding or errors in the tutor's performance as to both correcting and in turn, sharpening their critical thinking. Additionally, it is a more reasonable educational approach in which the learners are able to express their ideas autonomously, which will entail a dynamic learning environment when the process of exchanging thoughts is facilitated by the willingness of teachers to perceive comments and students’ respectful attitudes toward them. As a result, it will structure a solid and liberal education system, promoting further abstractions.

To conclude, the concept of criticism depends upon personal perspectives toward it. Profoundly, the implications could bring dire consequences if actions are not taken under the consciousness of morality. Instead, it should be better used for improvement in any circumstances.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-12 minh phương phạm hồng 73 view
2023-02-05 tieuquynh 89 view
2022-12-19 Lunar Tran 67 view
2022-12-18 Lunar Tran 61 view
2022-09-12 Charles Le 84 view
Essays by user sonnn :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tutors'' or 'tutor's'?
Suggestion: tutors'; tutor's
...r the misunderstanding or errors in the tutors performance as to both correcting and i...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, consequently, if, so, still, as to, for instance, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2167.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79411764706 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35535763949 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614973262032 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.0244597965 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.785714286 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214740493822 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653805301865 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377222855653 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112065046098 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514557530689 0.056905535591 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 78.4519038076 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.