Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers. Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Constructive criticisms, particularly in the educational environment, have been debated in many parts of the world nowadays. While there is a school of thought that students in high schools should be expected to share their own ideas about their teachers for the improvement of academic quality, I think that this will lead to a lack of respect and discipline towards their teachers in their classroom.
On the one hand, it is true that feedback from those students can significantly contribute to raising educational quality. One of the reasons is that those comments can help their teachers lecture more appropriately after each curriculum. As the teachers are able to realize the students’ academic performance in the class, they will design and teach those young people properly, boosting the students’ comprehension. Another benefit of allowing high school students to comment on their teachers is that it fosters independent critical thinking, which will be vital for them in later life. Thus, the leaders of high schools should generate a friendly educational environment in which their young children have opportunities to contribute their comments.
On the other hand, there are several drawbacks to encouraging high school students to make comments on their teachers. First, many overly sensitive teachers might be vulnerable to harsh comments from their students. Many school systems, particularly Asian ones, emphasize that teachers should be respected rather than criticized by their students. Furthermore, at those ages, children who are too young to understand the consequences of their actions and voices on their teachers are more likely to disrupt their classes with uncontrolled and toxic feedback and to behave poorly toward their teachers. Thus, it will be ineffective to improve educational quality if high school students contribute their comments to their teachers.
In conclusion, I believe that comments from high school students can cause an increasing deficiency of respect and discipline in the class; however, this trend might raise the quality of education to some extent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-12 | minh phương phạm hồng | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-19 | Lunar Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-18 | Lunar Tran | 61 | view |
| 2022-09-12 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- Today s fresh food like vegetables or fruits travels thousands of miles from the rural areas or farms before it reaches customers in cities or urban areas Why is this Is this a positive or negative trend Give reasons for your answer and include any releva 89
- Some people believe that sport has an important role in society Others however feel that it is nothing more than a leisure activity for some people Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant ex 67
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development 84
- Overpopulation in many major urban centers around the world is a major problem What are the causes of this How can this be solved 84
- The use of social media is replacing the face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 02 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, while, i think, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53395061728 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92551404873 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509259259259 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1613849648 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.923076923 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403005580166 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160542310802 0.084324248473 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887927794741 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259676141176 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580115650027 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, while, i think, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53395061728 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92551404873 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509259259259 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1613849648 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.923076923 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403005580166 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160542310802 0.084324248473 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887927794741 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259676141176 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580115650027 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.