Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference in income earnings between the rich and poor.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Recently, the concerns about the gap between the wealth and the poverty have been a hot debate in many parts of the world. While there is a school of thought that the best method to tackle this issue might be to make an equal individual's income, I completely disagree with this view.
Without any doubt, decreasing the differences in financial supply would both not resolve the root of this phenomenon and lead to increase other inequalities in society, for example towards people with dedication. It is also argued that a happy and wealthy society might start up from competitiveness or struggle with environmental selections to create achievements and breakthroughs, as well. When it comes to historical evidence, the collapse of the socialist countries in the twentieth century might be a typical instance of attempts to create equality by limitation of economic development.
In addition, there are many other methods to raise happiness without concerns of income. According to surveys of human growth, other conditions would play a crucial role such as mental health, opportunities for the development of intelligence development, and other materials. For example, the wealth and happiness of a nation could be appreciated by the number of literate children or employees’ satisfaction. If there are favorable living conditions, the community will be fulfilled with joy and prosperity.
In conclusion, migrating the gap of income between the rich and poor might not be a measure to balance society. Personally, authorities would consider improving the quality of living rather than apply higher taxes towards individuals in society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-13 | tttran12 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-18 | Lunar Tran | 78 | view |
- In many countries household waste eg Food packing is increasing day by day What are the reasons How can this problem be solved 84
- The uses of mobile phone have a lot of negative impacts on social medical and technical problems What are the problems of using mobile phone Do you think that using mobile phone is negative 89
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from yo 67
- In the modern world the image photograph or film is becoming a more powerful way of communicating than the written word To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Every government has a duty to provide free health care for its people What are the advantages and disadvantages of government providing free healthcare Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...le this issue might be to make an equal individuals income, I completely disagree with this...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4046692607 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09990502995 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622568093385 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4117240169 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.272727273 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140619080044 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488795260167 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423579239474 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0814458896767 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258958776842 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.