Nowadays, more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same jobs. Give some problems this situation causes.
In a world of increasing competition, the fresh graduates have to grample against a burgeoning number of senior candidates for the same positions. This phenomenon has, indeed, exerted impacts on the society and this essay will examine those effects.
First and foremost, the soaring confrontation between the youths and the elderly makes many from both sides become susceptible to unemployment.
With the perks of being more energetic and agile, the young applicants are highly-sought after by contemporary enterprises as they are in desperate need of employees who can adapt themselves to lasting working hours and business trips to places with hostile climatic conditions. As for the old candidates, they are formidable with overwhelming hands-on experience and a wide scope of knowledge, which are without a doubt benefecial for corporations as the experienced ones can introduce incrementally innovative ideas for the betterment of their workplace. Therefore, chronic confrontation for certain jobs lead to escalating unemployment since either component of the labour force has its own strength, and the dismerits of one side are the merits of another and vice versa.
Another detriment stemming from this happening is the imbalance in the labour market. When the young and old candidates keep applying for specific positions, namely jobs in business settings, the labour market demonstrates a major leaning towards those desirable occupations, and thus leaves the rest unoccupied. Consequently, some jobs are attatched great importance and drive a great many of applicants regardless of age; while thousands of undesirable jobs are at a low ebb because of the dearth of labourers.
To recapitulate, the rising tension in the labour market owing to the young and old applicants culminates in a surge in unemployment and thriving imbalance in the occupation market.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-28 | haikhoa0914z | 84 | view |
- The damage to the environment is increasing at an alarming rate due to human activities What are some of the ways in which humans are damaging to the environment 56
- Nowadays more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same jobs Give some problems this situation causes 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, so, therefore, thus, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5331010453 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14999537023 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613240418118 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.4558901915 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.8 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150011997762 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490973585874 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334698221132 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0596883089376 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532013644183 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.39 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.