More and more people are not eating meals together with their family member Why is this Do the advantages outweigh the demerits

Essay topics:

More and more people are not eating meals together with their family member. Why is this? Do the advantages outweigh the demerits?

Having a fairly high activity makes people not to eat with family members. Although it can reduce the level of family pressure, this brings more disadvantages such as lack of communication and social skills.
Many people do not spend time to eat with family members because they have different activities and busy schedules. If parents tend to be too focused on work, which spends more than 8 hours, while children tend to spend time with their peers outside the home then the opportunity to eat together is small. Evidence suggests that, workers who live in the big city are more likely to do a lot of office activities where the company has provided food services for its employees, and for schoolchildren, they prefer to dine out at fastfood after school.
Lack of skills and poor communication among family members can be strong negative impacts resulted from this. This is because, parents do not have the opportunity to build relationships that are beneficial for children's development. However, if there is a personal conflict in a family, eating together can increase the level of pressure and stress. Although not eating together can reduce stress levels, not eating with family can make family members have poor social skills. Evidence appears to indicate that, research by NASW states that 55% of children who eat less with family members tend to have poorer social skills like disrespectful and unappreciative than children who eat meals with their family.
In conclusion, people do not eat with family members because of busyness which causes a lack of bonding and relationships with each other. I believe that the negative impacts will be more like poor parenting and child development.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-03-02 bgs.id 89 view
2022-02-07 nur pitriyah etika 71 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ving a fairly high activity makes people not to eat with family members. Although...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, while, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09285714286 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70372947264 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539285714286 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5494120199 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.833333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376751807424 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143336762572 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059668218862 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243957355641 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0117282004652 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.