Improvements in health, education, and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations.
However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The betterment of health, education, and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of fortunate nations should take more responsibility for helping the unfortunate nations in such areas. I agree with the statement
of countries with more prosperity rates, should help underdeveloped nations in the name of humanity.
We see how world wars have brought negative impacts on nations. Countries were divided into groups, those who win the war and dominate the global wealth and be called the core countries, and those who lose became the semi-periphery countries, others were just collateral damage, as we know they were called the periphery countries, those who survive underdeveloped. The delayed development in certain areas such as poor management in health, education, and trade is suffocating the nations and slowing down the progress on the day-to-day life of its citizens. The outside support could mean the world to them.
The government of wealthier countries holds more wealth globally and should share by helping the poorer countries so we all can survive together. But this is not the responsibility of the richer nations, a nation should be able to help themselves, external aid is needed but should not always be depended on it. They could help in many forms, for instance, in health areas the rich countries could help them to build health facilities or give scholarship programs for the bright students to dive into medicine. As for the education field, the core countries could help with giving scholarships for higher education, or give assistance on the latest education system they could implement. Trade is a special case, giving opportunity for international trade to the poor country could help them build their economy so they can increase their citizen's life expectancies.
In conclusion, aligning with the statement of wealthier countries should help the underdeveloped ones, I agree with it, thinking that it is the responsibility of each government to fulfill their national interest, a helping hand was just there when we were already out of options.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-09-18 | nijam | 84 | view |
2023-04-06 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 73 | view |
2023-03-02 | InamAli | 73 | view |
2023-01-26 | Guiseppe59192 | 70 | view |
2022-06-29 | Guri473812 | 61 | view |
- Some people argue that it is not wise for an industry to replace its experienced but old workers with new and young yet inexperienced individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 60
- the diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building induustry summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 17
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 81
- Some think increasing business and cultural contact between nations is positive Others think it leads to the disappearance of the national identity Discuss both views and state your own opinion 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n such areas. I agree with the statement of countries with more prosperity rates,...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...pport could mean the world to them. The government of wealthier countries holds...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, as for, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3293768546 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95733023376 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513353115727 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.6948605884 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.153846154 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9230769231 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354093382207 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142037728222 0.084324248473 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117100365161 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238241139023 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167187309485 0.056905535591 294% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.