Some people argue that it is not wise for an industry to replace its experienced but old workers with new and young yet inexperienced individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A number of people believe that the industry is not being wise to replace the old-experienced employee with the new-young-inexperienced worker. Disagreeing directly with the statement would be inappropriate without further explanation, therefore this essay will explain my statement regarding the topic.
Being old in the world of work is two sides of a coin. Whether you've mastered your work or just run out of time within the workforce. Furthermore, being old could affect your entire movement in the office, your nimbleness becomes debatable and ineffective. Becoming ineffective means that you could no longer endure the workloads you usually bear, and sometimes that ineffectiveness could cause some serious damage to you and your employer. Another point is that the older you get the more vulnerable you become to diseases. Companies have a responsibility to provide their employees with a good health care package, this has been deepening the budget. The longer an employee stays unhealthy for example, the medical bill flies into the office more often.
Yet from the industry standpoint, manpower is just a tool to keep the engine of money running, just a small price to pay and always disposable. That is why if being old means that there is no more energy to harness from you after that the new you comes in. Young, energetic, willing to be guided in this jungle of survival are the ideal qualities the company seeks on potential personnel, they could live up to the company's expectancies of a workforce, not to mentions the stiffness towards the standard operational procedures ruled by the company. The freshly graduated worker is the choice company chooses when the older employees are acting out, like asking for a raise or taking more leaves out for personal reasons. The starting salary for fresh graduates is cheap, and usually have 2 years minimum to move up. So companies would gain a cheap human resource that does the same amount of work as those who work longer for two years, this is a win for them, more practical, wiser.
To sum up, I think that disposing of the old worker with the new one is just a logical consequence in terms of the world of work. It is all written within the company policies, therefore I think that business is all about logic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-18 | unkownme2020@gmail.com | 81 | view |
| 2022-02-10 | emjhie | 78 | view |
| 2021-04-24 | Dyor | 73 | view |
| 2017-03-23 | SuperArmut | 74 | view |
- some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age Some think they should begin at least 7 years old Discuss both views and give opinions 61
- In many countries people do not recycle waste materials such as bottles and newspapers What are the reasons for this What could be done to solve this problem 56
- Some people believe that the radio is more enjoyable and practical than TV Do you agree 56
- Some people argue that it is not wise for an industry to replace its experienced but old workers with new and young yet inexperienced individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The graph below shows the number of inquiries received by the tourist by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: you've
...of work is two sides of a coin. Whether youve mastered your work or just run out of t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[4]
Message: The pronoun 'you' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'come'
Suggestion: come
...harness from you after that the new you comes in. Young, energetic, willing to be gui...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, regarding, so, therefore, for example, i think, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1915.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98697916667 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83049677059 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5859375 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5947489057 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.647058824 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5882352941 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35294117647 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226202821212 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708076687892 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926500967827 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14242875105 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754880692819 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.