Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that verbal communication shows a greater impact compare to writing. Personally, I totally disagree with this point of view as both methods can be effective for communicating.
On the one hand, speech communication brings various advantages for people. The reason is that it can inspire other people and drive them to success. Take motivational speeches, for example, it has the ability to evoke listener emotion through author voice adding with motivated soundtracks. This creates a positive effect for audiences as they can increase their energy to complete their work tasks. Secondly, it will be easier to understand other people through oral communication as it is comprehensible to express emotions using body language.
On the other hand, writing can also be an effective way to communicate, especially for commercial trading or contract signing. Take organization, for example, written messages, emails, or documents play an important role in running a business. Written documents are usually required in legal procedures which have various regulations and obligations as it stated clearly and can be evidence for any law circumstances. Moreover, employees are able to reread documents repeatedly in order to avoid mistakes happening while doing their tasks. As a result, written documents can provide certainty for organizations to avoid unwanted risks.
In conclusion, there are sufficient grounds to believe that spoken communication has more influence than written communication. Therefore, it is my genuine belief that both methods of communicating have their own effect, benefits, and drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-24 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 78
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 89
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65447154472 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15445321007 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642276422764 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.4240343596 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.3571428571 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155242525894 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561443799845 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687498530924 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111700831386 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732981606737 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65447154472 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15445321007 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642276422764 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.4240343596 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.3571428571 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155242525894 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561443799845 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687498530924 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111700831386 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732981606737 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.