Oil use of major consumers (2015)
The graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030
The line graph highlights the amount of oil consumed per day in four different areas over 22 years, starting from 2009.
Overall, the total of oil use in the US, Western Europe and Japan follows downward trends over the period shown. The opposite tendency, however, can be seen in China and the Middle East.
From 2009 to 2015, the total barrels of oil used daily in the US was around 10 billion. The figure, then, is anticipated to sharply decline to the lowest threshold of 4 billion after 15 years. Meanwhile, the number of daily consumed oil in Western and Japan began at 4 billion and decreased to about 3 billion after 6 years. This is predicted to continue decreasing to 2 million by 2030.
China’s oil consumption was below 2 billion in 2009, and this number is forecasted to gradually increase to above 3 billion by 2030. A careful glance at the graph reveals that the statistics for China coincide with the Middle East in terms of past observation as well as future projections. Nevertheless, the Middle East’s oil consumption seems to fluctuate more than China’s.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-20 | vonhuquynh | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-08 | Munn Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | Nguyễn Thảo Phương | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-25 | Bui Thanh Phuong | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-23 | Minh Pham | 67 | view |
- Oil use of major consumers 2015 The graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030 78
- The diagrams illustrate 3 different types of bridges
- Many people choose to travel abroad to learn a foreign language instead of studying in their home town Do the advantages of learning a new language in this way outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century and protection of wild animal is waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The pictures illustrate three different types of bridges 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, then, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79679144385 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65648943974 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609625668449 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0848713723 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206647375443 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775815690184 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699367537362 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125290973432 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334273186802 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.